Skip to content

Presentation

The abolition of the flat-rate withholding tax (PFL) in 2013 and the introduction of the single flat-rate levy (PFU) in 2018 were two significant – yet opposing – reforms of the taxation of investment income. The former aimed to ‘restore tax fairness’, whilst the latter aimed to ‘support private investment’. We analyse tax data from households and firms to conduct an évaluation of the 2013 reform, and present preliminary findings regarding the impact of the 2018 reform.

We find that the increase in taxation on capital income had a very strong negative impact on dividends received by households, whilst there was no impact on other forms of income (wages, capital gains and other capital income). Using company data, we are able to identify the mechanism behind this decline in dividends received: firms directly controlled by individuals resident in France reduced or ceased dividend payments between 2013 and 2017. We observe an increase in the financial assets held by these firms, a rise in equity and a fall in net profit, but no effect on investment.

The implications of these findings are significant: the 2013 reform resulted in a net loss of tax revenue, but had no negative impact on investment. Using data from commercial court registries, we highlight a 15.3 per cent increase in dividends paid in 2018, attributable to the flat tax reform. This increase in dividend distributions, which runs parallel to the decline seen in 2013, will lead to higher tax revenues than initially anticipated. However, given the effects of the 2013 reform, it is likely that no positive impact on private investment should be expected from this reform.

Key Results

  • The 2013 reform abolishing the flat-rate withholding tax led to a 40 per cent fall in declared dividends, but no change in other household income.
  • Firms controlled by individuals have stopped paying dividends and are accumulating more financial assets. There has also been an increase in equity and a fall in net profit.
  • The 2013 reform did not have any negative effects on investment. The lack of impact of dividend taxation on investment is corroborated by studies based on US and Swedish data.
  • The 2013 reform was projected to generate tax revenue of €400 million; however, taking into account the behavioural responses observed, it resulted in a shortfall in income tax and social security contributions of €900 million.
  • The introduction of the PFU in 2018 led to a 15 per cent increase in dividends paid. Taking social security contributions into account, the PFU is estimated to have cost the public purse €400 million in 2018, compared with €900 million if behavioural responses were not taken into account.
  • Given the effects observed in 2013, the reform of the PFU is unlikely to lead to an increase in private investment.

Method and Data

Partners

Sénat
Last modified: July 21, 2026