Skip to content

Context

The impact of changes in management and/or majority shareholder(s) on corporate performance

Since 2003, several measures aimed at reducing the tax burden on business transfers have been introduced, particularly to benefit intra-family transfers, which are now significantly favoured over transfers to third parties or to employees. Encouraging businesses to remain within family ownership would be justified if the economic performance of such businesses proved to be better than that of others. However, whilst economic theory provides some insights, it does not allow us to conclude that one form of governance is superior to others. This question must be resolved empirically, by comparing theoretical arguments with the available data.

Presentation

The aim of our research project is to attempt to establish a causal link between changes in the governance of family-owned businesses and the performance of these businesses. We do this by comparing the performance of family-owned firms over the period 2005 to 2014 that have not undergone any changes in governance, with that of family-owned firms which, whilst initially family-owned, underwent a change in their governance structure, whether through a change in management or a change in shareholding. Whilst we focus in particular on intra-family business transfers, the originality of this study lies in also analysing the performance of companies that have been sold to a third party (individuals, French or foreign companies, investment funds) or that have changed their majority shareholder.

Research Team

This project is led by the pole Firms.
Coordinator: Laurent Bach

Partners

Direction générale des entreprises (DGE)
Last modified: July 20, 2026