Skip to content

Presentation

The Educational Success Programmes (PRE), established by the 2005 Social Cohesion Act, constitute an ambitious policy to tackle inequality of opportunity, aimed at children and young people facing the greatest difficulties. The aim of these programmes is to provide children in priority neighbourhoods under the Urban policy with a personalised pathway based on a holistic approach to the difficulties they face, in close collaboration with their families (social and medical support, cultural or sporting activities, creative workshops and various forms of academic support). They benefit more than 100,000 children.

The impact analysis presented in this report is based on two surveys carried out in around 100 schools (the first in autumn 2012, the second in spring 2014) involving children in CE1 and CM1, their parents, their teachers and the PRE coordinators. In order to document as fully as possible the range of difficulties faced by the children and their families, and the effects of the PREs on these difficulties, the questionnaires cover a wide range of areas, drawing on multiple perspectives. Each child therefore completed several questionnaires designed to measure their perceived quality of life, self-esteem and motivation towards schoolwork, which complemented the évaluation of cognitive skills carried out through maths and French tests. Teachers were also asked to perform evaluation of various academic skills and attitudes towards learning for each child, and were questioned about the children’s family background. Parents were also interviewed about their relationship with the school and their child’s situation.

We measure the impact of the PREs by comparing the progress of 404 children who took part in a programme between autumn 2012 and spring 2014 with that of 290 children who initially had comparable characteristics across the many dimensions measured, but who were not participating in a programme because their school was not affiliated with a PRE.

Key Results

Thus, children’s psychological well-being and behaviour do not appear to be improved by participation in the PRE programme, and other measures of relationships with others (social self-esteem, problems with other children) even deteriorate slightly for children in the programme compared with children with similar characteristics. In terms of academic performance, pupils on the programme also show a slightly less favourable trend in certain aspects of motivation for school, but their objective skills in mathematics and French develop in a similar way to those of the other children we monitored, and they are more diligent. The parents of pupils in the programme do not show any specific changes, either in their relationship with the school or in their perception of access to health and social services. Ultimately, our data provide no evidence to suggest that PREs have, on average, led to greater cognitive and non-cognitive progress among beneficiary children than among non-beneficiary children with very similar initial difficulties. However, we are not statistically able to distinguish between potentially different effects across sub-populations of children.

To understand this result, it should be emphasised that PREs offer support to families but rely heavily on resources available under general law. However, the effects on children that we estimate are, ultimately, the effects of the sum of the activities in which the children were actually involved. These activities often include sports, stays at leisure centres and academic support – in short, activities offered locally by various organisations, but which were not developed specifically for this highly disadvantaged group and are not necessarily very intensive. Research has demonstrated the long-term effects, extending into adulthood, of programmes in other countries that are comparable in their philosophy but more costly, start at an earlier age, and which themselves design the specific activities from which the children benefit, exposing them to these in a highly intensive manner. To be more effective in addressing the immense challenges posed by children in very difficult social circumstances, PREs should therefore perhaps be given the resources to roll out their own interventions much more frequently, and to target children of pre-school age more specifically.

Partners

CGETDirection de l’évaluation de la prospective et de la performance (DEPP)
Last modified: July 21, 2026